Short-Term Encounters — Creator-Labelled Records
HIMR repeatedly used first-person titles about dating, hookups, sexual experiences, and brief encounters. This page keeps three evidence layers separate: a publication-history catalogue of video titles, a Daniel-attributed Patreon writing map, and warned machine leads about narrated encounters. It is not a list of people Daniel demonstrably met or had sex with, and it must not be used to construct one.
What the catalogue establishes
Section titled “What the catalogue establishes”The August 25, 2026 snapshot and later Patreon-to-video reconciliation contain the eighteen selected title records below. A raw-backed row means only that the manifest reconciles the transcript record to an Internet Archive file. It does not mean that the spoken story has been reviewed. The date is an archive label, not necessarily the date of the alleged encounter.
| Archive date | Exact archive title | Available sources | What can safely be said |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-23 | My first sexual experience | Raw video | A first-person sexual-experience title exists; the event and any third-party account are unverified. |
| 2017-02-03 | The French girlfriend | Raw video | A relationship-labelled title exists. It supplies no origin, family history, encounter, or stable identity for the unnamed person. |
| 2017-05-18 | My Gay Experience With A Japanese Guy / Why I let a Japanese guy give me a blowjob | First title alias; explicit title alias | Internet Archive exposes two byte-identical MP4s with the same M4PdbuE-m44 ID, size, MD5, and SHA-1. They are title aliases for one source record, not two encounters. The explicit received-act wording remains creator/archive framing, not proof of the act, consent, either person’s orientation, or identity. |
| 2017-06-15 | The Korean girl that got away | Raw video | The title exists and the raw file is mapped. Its transcript has an implausible-speech-rate flag, and the title establishes no age, relationship, meeting, or sexual event. |
| 2017-10-11 | Meeting married women in Japan on Tinder | Raw video | “Meeting,” “married,” and Tinder are title framing; no match, meeting, affair, or sexual encounter is established. |
| 2018-06-23 | I ejaculated in 5 seconds-ph5b2dc0759633f | Raw video | An explicit first-person title exists; its odd suffix is retained archive text. It does not establish a setting, participant, act, or timing claim. |
| 2018-11-21 | My experience dating a Japanese single mother | Raw video | A dating-story title exists; it does not verify parenthood, identity, a meeting, or sexual activity. A second archive title maps to the same platform ID and is not counted again. |
| 2018-11-27 | My WORST ever tinder | Raw video | A negative Tinder-story title exists; “worst” is Daniel’s evaluation and no date participant’s conduct is accepted. |
| 2018-12-13 | tinder date ep.1 / Patreon-only encounter title | Raw video; Patreon post 23304815 L |
The shared video ID Cv-aYDnFffc creates an exact record bridge. Daniel’s Patreon title alleges an encounter with an unnamed Japanese woman; the body is only a video link and the raw audio remains unchecked. |
| 2019-07-10 | My experience paying for sex in japan | Raw video | A first-person paid-sex title exists; no transaction, act, participant, price, place, legality, or consent is verified. |
| 2019-09-29 | I met a Swedish girl and got BLACKMAILED | Raw video | A creator-title allegation exists; neither the meeting nor alleged blackmail is verified. |
| 2020-03-15 | Why I Slept with my Fan | Raw video | The title’s intimate claim remains unverified. Checked imagery associates the public Pia label with the edited story, as qualified on the Pia page. |
| 2020-04-28 | My Gay Experience in Japan | Raw video | A later similarly labelled account exists; metadata alone does not prove that it retells the 2017 record or establish the event. |
| 2020-05-15 | Top 4 Weirdest Places I Had Cereal | Raw video | “Top 4” is a story-title format, not a partner count. The warned contextual reading distinguishes different story categories; no intimate event is verified. |
| 2020-11-23 | The FATTEST girl I ever smashed | Raw video | The body-shaming and sexual wording is Daniel’s title, not the wiki’s description. No person, body characteristic, or sexual event is verified. |
| 2021-08-18 | Why I Slept with my Viewer s Girlfriend | Raw video; checked Pia comparison; Caesium trail | The checked 00:13 introduction reuses the same WHSmith source photograph as the 2020 Pia-associated montage, creating a first-party editorial bridge to Pia. Community usage maps the unnamed viewer/boyfriend to Caesium. The title names neither and proves no relationship, encounter, or consent. |
| 2022-02-22 | I SLEPT WITH A GIRL | Raw video | The title’s sexual implication is Daniel’s framing; the act and unnamed person’s involvement are unverified. |
| 2023-10-08 | The craziest viewer I ever slept with | Recovered raw video | The supplemental archive supplies a raw file, but its contents have not been reviewed. “Craziest” is not adopted as a description of a person. |
This is a sequence of eighteen source records, not eighteen distinct encounters. Titles can retell an older story, combine several stories, or use “slept with” and “cereal” as click-oriented wording. Most rows provide no stable participant identifier. Even where checked imagery supplies the Pia story bridge, that joins creator-edited records—not private identity, relationship status, or a verified event.
What the retained Patreon writing adds
Section titled “What the retained Patreon writing adds”Every Patreon body in this section was read directly. P means the complete body was visible signed out on August 29, 2026; L means the public page exposed metadata but the body came from the non-redistributed preservation copy. Patreon publication dates are not presumed to be encounter dates.
| Patreon publication | Daniel’s written account | Classification and boundary |
|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-20 and 2017-07-25 | 11282590 L and 13344792 L say, in Daniel’s account, that a French-former-girlfriend role and a separate man he labels Japanese and bisexual each performed oral sex on him. The later post repeats the received-act claim and portrays further post-breakup contact as initiated by the former partner. |
Two recurring anonymous roles, not two independently verified events. “Bisexual” is Daniel’s label for the man, not a verified orientation. The act, consent-sensitive post-breakup account, consent, and coercion remain unverified. Private images, appearance, and family detail are excluded. Same-day post 11283194 L, published 57 minutes after 11282590, embeds I got a blowjob (unedited) under ID CbfZ3sEywC4; its different ID and lack of a named participant make it a plausible companion, not an exact media or person bridge. |
| 2017-07-15 | Public-body post 12990510 P associates a room from Daniel’s first Japan trip with what he calls his first sexual experience. |
A first-person recollection with no participant identified. It is not automatically the event behind the 2016 video title, and two former-girlfriend roles mentioned elsewhere in the body are not assigned to it. |
| 2017-08-24 | 14033039 L describes a prior-year evening walk with an Iranian-Girl-labelled contact. Daniel also alleges that she damaged an object and discarded a cigarette near a former spouse’s property. |
One alleged outing, not a sexual or relationship finding. The property-damage account is uncorroborated; the private place, image, and Daniel’s disparaging description are omitted. |
| 2017-10-18 | Public-body post 14922710 P announces planned, more detailed Tinder-date blogs for $3 patrons. |
A creator-product plan, not proof that a date happened or that a dedicated blog series was delivered. No later retained post is unmistakably a fulfilment of that promise. |
| 2017-11-13 | 15360865 L says Daniel believed earlier public admissions of cheating and related intimate topics had alienated some supporters. |
A retrospective account of audience reaction, not a participant, date, event count, or bridge to Tomoko or another known role. Sensitive health detail is omitted. |
| 2018-01-21 and 2018-04-13 | 16524132 L says an old Tinder profile remained active while Daniel denied current use. 18154223 L says marriage meant no more new-girlfriend or Tinder-hookup videos and that he saw little point using Tinder if he could not publish the result. |
Account status and creator intention only. Neither body establishes a match, meeting, sexual encounter, or orientation. |
| 2018-02-15 | 17007133 L says Daniel met a Kyoto-Girl-labelled contact shortly after arriving in Japan, concealed the outing from Tomoko, understood it as a possible date, and had no further contact. |
A Daniel-attributed one-off meeting with no sexual claim. It is kept separate from Tomoko and from the unspecified October meetings below. The other person’s alleged dating-app statements are not adopted. |
| 2018-03-31 | 17875376 L says Daniel met several unnamed women during an October, while expressly denying sex and describing the meetings as content, boredom, and keeping options open. |
“Several” is not converted into a number or mapped one-to-one to archive titles. The remainder of the body concerns sensitive allegations about his partner and Australian Guy and is not imported here. |
| 2018-05-21 | 18935501 L broadly characterizes Daniel’s guesthouse period as involving different partners and links those stories to his channel’s appeal. |
An aggregate self-description—not a count, date range, or new set of participants. It likely overlaps records already on this page. |
| 2018-12-13 | 23304815 L uses a retrospective encounter title and links video ID Cv-aYDnFffc. |
Exact Patreon-to-archive record bridge, but only title-level encounter framing. The body adds no narrative beyond the link, and event date, participant, setting, and video speech remain unverified. |
| 2019-03-24 | 25601953 L refers to an encounter with an unnamed stranger while Daniel contrasts it with married life and expresses regret. |
An anonymous self-account with no event date or source bridge. It is not labelled adultery or merged with Pia, the SD-card incident, the German/Turkish sequence, or another unnamed person. |
| 2019-03-30 | 25739362 L calls its target an old 2017 video, directly links the archived M4PdbuE-m44 file, and says Daniel wondered what would have happened had he said yes to sex with the man. |
This creates an exact Patreon-to-archived-file bridge for the 2017 Japanese-Guy story. That counterfactual does not itself retract the separate received-oral-sex claim in the 2017 captions or the public alias title. The displayed YouTube text uses ID ryoAFkCRzZg, so no original-platform-ID reconciliation is claimed. The source cluster still does not verify the act, what prompted the counterfactual, consent circumstances, the private man’s identity or orientation, or Daniel’s orientation. |
| 2019-04-05 | 25902646 L describes an English contact whose prospective meeting was repeatedly delayed before contact ended. |
An unrealized plan, not an encounter. A separate private first name and exact proposed location are withheld, and this contact is not joined to later Essex-labelled records. |
| 2019-04-25 | 26358613 L distinguishes a German-Girl-labelled contact whose planned meeting Daniel says fell through, Turkish Girl, whom he explicitly says he did meet, and another prospective English contact. Daniel characterizes the wider trip as sex-motivated and estimates about £2,000 in total trip spending. |
The German contact’s prior in-person status remains unresolved; the Turkish meeting is the only one explicitly described in this post, and the body does not clearly establish a sexual act. The amount is Daniel’s trip-cost estimate—not payment for sex. All three roles remain distinct, and the future English meeting remains a plan. |
| 2020-05-09 | 36935788 L says a first date with Mila was followed shortly by a multiweek stay and continued contact. |
A relationship arc rather than an anonymous one-off. It remains on Mila’s page and is not counted again here as a separate short-term partner. |
April 2019: two accounts of the Germany meeting
Section titled “April 2019: two accounts of the Germany meeting”The April 13 archive-labelled video Complete Waste Of F#&KING TIME - Germany Trip and the April 14 First day in Germany both contain a machine-rendered first-person account in which Daniel says he met a woman during the trip and describes a meal, walk, and return to his hotel. The next-day video retells the episode. These are Daniel’s accounts, not independent confirmation of the meeting or the other person’s actions. They complicate the April 25 Patreon account above, which describes a German-Girl-labelled meeting plan as having fallen through. The sources do not explicitly connect the Patreon role to either video, so the identity and chronology remain unresolved; the two recordings do not establish the Patreon role’s identity.
Japanese-man “bisexual guy” label and the received-act connection
Section titled “Japanese-man “bisexual guy” label and the received-act connection”The sources support a stronger record connection than the previous wording showed.
Internet Archive retains M4PdbuE-m44 under both My Gay Experience With A Japanese
Guy and Why I let a Japanese guy give me a blowjob. The two original MP4 objects
are byte-identical: each is 133,512,428 bytes, with MD5
2591876f176b5eb1c7f51823e032aed2, SHA-1
b5e631ce6319aadddc4f07fb3a37ce5bda026f03, and a 583.56-second duration. These are
two filenames for the same archived video, not separate encounters.
The retained Patreon writing adds three distinct connections:
- May 20 post
11282590publicly labels the pictured private role a Japanese bisexual guy, while Daniel’s locked caption claims that the man performed oral sex on him. - July 25 post
13344792repeats the received-act claim and Daniel’s bisexual label while placing the man in the same French-former-girlfriend social cluster. The private photographs and appearance or family details are not reproduced. - March 30, 2019 post
25739362directly targets the archivedM4PdbuE-m44file and says Daniel wondered what would have happened had he said yes to sex with the man. That counterfactual is not a denial of the separately claimed received act; the post does not explain what prompted it.
The recurring captioned role and the exact video/repost bridge therefore belong in one navigation cluster, but they do not authenticate the private man as the same person in every record or prove that every record describes one event. No stable name or account ID is present, and the encounter date remains unknown.
The same-day 11283194 embed is adjacent evidence, not part of the exact M4 bridge. It
uses the subject I got a blowjob (unedited) and YouTube ID CbfZ3sEywC4, but names
no participant and has not been matched to a retained public video. It is therefore
not counted as another Japanese-man event or silently merged with M4PdbuE-m44.
The table deliberately excludes sales-themed link post 11362484, fictional
“first encounter” artwork 12704962, partner-history posts about Australian Guy,
and love-doll posts. None describes a separate short-term encounter by Daniel.
Audit of the circulating year-by-year list
Section titled “Audit of the circulating year-by-year list”A contributor supplied an unverified, non-exhaustive year-bucketed list of alleged sexual partners. It was useful as a discovery index, but publishing it as a body-count chronology would overstate the source record. The audit produced three different outcomes:
- Seven additional exact or near-exact creator-title records from that discovery
list were located and added. The later Patreon audit independently added the
Cv-aYDnFffcrecord bridge. These records verify publication labels and source identity, not the list’s more graphic narratives or a one-record-to-one-person mapping. - Recurring public labels such as Chihiro, Turkish Girl, Pia, Mila, Faster, Blood Bucket, Sunny, and Weed Girl already have source-qualified pages. Those pages document different kinds of public association; the supplied list is not enough to reclassify every person as a sexual partner.
- Access-controlled Patreon claims are now admitted only as the minimized, Daniel-attributed summaries above. Unsupported community lore, private-place detail, body commentary, medical labels, and Discord recollections without an adequate source bridge remain omitted.
The year buckets are also not event dates. Most located dates are archive labels for when Daniel published or streamed a retelling, sometimes years after the alleged event. Duplicate titles, retrospectives, and euphemisms make a defensible partner count impossible from the current evidence.
Paid short-term encounters: intentions, accounts and changing explanations
Section titled “Paid short-term encounters: intentions, accounts and changing explanations”These are source dates and Daniel’s accounts, not a verified transaction log. Research found a useful distinction between considering payment, claiming to have paid, regretting the spending, and retelling a story through Bilbo. Repeated accounts and multiple archive copies do not establish additional encounters. No provider identity, booking instructions, private location or purported price guide is published.
July 2017: considering payment, not reporting a completed encounter
Section titled “July 2017: considering payment, not reporting a completed encounter”In Thinking about paying for sex, Daniel’s machine-rendered opening describes having considered it during the preceding year in Japan. He discusses reluctance about the expense and the process, and says the absence of mutual attraction would diminish the experience for him. That is a statement of consideration and personal attitude, not a completed encounter or a verified claim about sex workers’ feelings.
July 2019: claimed experience and subsequent regret
Section titled “July 2019: claimed experience and subsequent regret”My experience paying for sex in japan moves beyond consideration. In its machine account, Daniel presents himself as having used both an arranged visit to his accommodation and an in-person venue, comparing the two. The source’s cereal terminology is part of its presentation; near the end he explains that he is avoiding certain words to keep the story family-friendly. This is his public paid-sex framing, not an independently verified transaction, participant count or account from any provider.
His closing assessment is negative: the machine passage attributes to him regret about the spending and a stated intention not to repeat it. That is a useful part of the chronology, but an intention to stop is not evidence that he stopped. The September account below should be read alongside it.
Consent-related account and Daniel’s later denial
Section titled “Consent-related account and Daniel’s later denial”In the August 21, 2019-labelled Recreating my home from England - day 5, the machine account explicitly returns to the earlier paid-encounter story. Daniel denies rape after describing a critical comment, while again acknowledging the refusal in his retelling. He offers his own explanation about Japanese law and interprets the other person’s purported conduct as willingness. The wiki does not endorse that legal explanation or treat payment, silence or non-resistance as proof of consent. The critic’s alleged comment and the woman’s account are not independently authenticated here.
No independent corroboration, authenticated account from the unnamed provider or official finding about the alleged encounter was located in this bounded review. The later denial is included as Daniel’s response, not as independent evidence for or against his earlier narrative. Graphic detail and his descriptions of the woman’s body are omitted.
September 2019: renewed claims and a joke disclaimer within the same stream
Section titled “September 2019: renewed claims and a joke disclaimer within the same stream”In the September 20-labelled I Dont Know What To Do About Everything, the machine account renders Daniel describing further paid encounters, including one he places in August, and again regretting the expense. Later in the same stream, after a question about recommending a service, he calls his earlier statements jokes and denies having used such services. Shortly afterward he again refers to having supplied a provider with business and money. The changing presentation is part of the record: neither the initial account nor the disclaimer is treated as a settled finding about what happened. This is not evidence that the July consent-related story was specifically retracted.
February 2020: an earlier Korea paid-encounter account
Section titled “February 2020: an earlier Korea paid-encounter account”In the February 12, 2020-labelled Trying 50% Discount Korean BEEF, the machine account renders Daniel describing his most recent cereal as the preceding night and saying that he paid. This is an earlier self-account alongside his April 2025 Korea retrospective, not independent corroboration of it. The filename date does not establish an exact encounter date, and the two sources do not establish whether they concern the same visit or provider. This anonymous role is not joined to other Korea dating stories.
2020–2021: Bilbo as a storytelling name
Section titled “2020–2021: Bilbo as a storytelling name”The August 2020-labelled The Truth behind Chinese ‘Massage Parlours’ in Japan narrates a paid-visit story through Bilbo, including supposed repeat visits. Bilbo should be understood here as a storytelling name Daniel uses, not a separately established friend or an additional person in an encounter count.
There is a useful later explanation of the device. In the July 12, 2021-labelled I Had A Weird And Unfortunate Night Yesterday, the machine account renders Daniel proposing to retell a story formerly presented as his own by saying it happened to his friend Bilbo instead. He then refers back to the massage-parlour video’s success. That supports the narrative-device reading; it does not prove that every Bilbo story is literally autobiographical or, conversely, wholly fictional. Sampled portions of the 2020 edit show illustrative street imagery, game footage and an inserted photograph; those samples do not visually establish the alleged encounter.
August 2021: failed arrangements and a claimed later visit
Section titled “August 2021: failed arrangements and a claimed later visit”In the August 2, 2021-labelled second week in new apartment making BURGER, the machine account renders Daniel saying that he prepaid two arrangements but nobody attended, which he characterizes as scams. He then describes finding another provider whom he claims did attend. The distinction matters: unsuccessful arrangements are not completed encounters, even within his own account. The payments, alleged scams and later visit are not independently established.
The passage uses cheesecake as a sexual euphemism; its separate terminology explanation does not verify the story. No provider identity, booking information, appearance commentary or graphic detail is reproduced.
April 2025: a retrospective Korea account, not a 2025 encounter date
Section titled “April 2025: a retrospective Korea account, not a 2025 encounter date”In the April 8, 2025-labelled life without my Girlfriend sucks…, Daniel’s machine account attributes some earlier spending to travel and paid encounters. He describes multiple visits during a stay in Korea. This adds a Korea-labelled retrospective to the Japan sources; it does not date those visits to 2025 or justify joining them to a specific earlier room tour. No independently verified provider or encounter count can be derived from his retrospective. Specific accommodation, purported private contact and intimate details are omitted.
September 2019: a separate blackmail-labelled record
Section titled “September 2019: a separate blackmail-labelled record”The September title alleges that Daniel “got BLACKMAILED.” This is an allegation in Daniel’s publication label, not a wiki finding. The title does not identify the alleged blackmailer, and this page neither connects the allegation to the unnamed woman nor treats nationality as evidence. No independent corroboration or response from the alleged actor was located in the source set used for this page.
2020–2023: retellings, euphemism, and the recovered October record
Section titled “2020–2023: retellings, euphemism, and the recovered October record”The 2017 and 2020 “Gay Experience” titles may look like two entries for the same
story, but title similarity is not enough to merge them. Conversely, it is not enough
to count them as two distinct events. Both remain separate source records until the
audio is checked. Within the 2017 record, however, the two M4 filenames are proven
aliases by their identical ID, bytes, hashes, and duration. The Patreon source
cluster further connects
the M4 file to Daniel’s received-oral-sex claim and his later counterfactual about
what might have happened had he said yes to sex. It does not prove the claimed
conduct, identify the private man, resolve the
displayed ryoAFkCRzZg text against the retained M4 target, or determine either
person’s orientation.
The May 2020 record’s warned contextual reading is kept on the cereal page. It explains why a four-place story format must not be converted into four additional partners or treated as proof of the narrated events.
The October 2023 title was the least reviewable item in the August 25 snapshot, which
supplied no raw-video URL, platform-ID candidate, or media hash. The supplemental
archive now supplies platform ID c2UrI729Ywc and the raw file linked below. That
recovery does not validate the generated transcript or summary, and nobody has yet
reviewed the file’s audio for this page.
The misleading June 2017 “10 year old boy” title
Section titled “The misleading June 2017 “10 year old boy” title”One June 9, 2017 archive label reads I slept with a 10 year old boy. It is not an adult encounter record and must not be read as a sexual-abuse allegation.
The snapshot preserves three title records for the same media identity:
| Archive title | Platform-ID candidate | Media duration | File hashes |
|---|---|---|---|
| I slept with a 10 year old boy | q5UkyKkBioA |
363.51 seconds | Identical MD5, SHA-1, and CRC32 |
| I slept with my best friend | q5UkyKkBioA |
363.51 seconds | Identical MD5, SHA-1, and CRC32 |
| My first sleepover | q5UkyKkBioA |
363.51 seconds | Identical MD5, SHA-1, and CRC32 |
Thus, the charged wording is an alternate catalogue title for the same file that is also labelled as a best-friend childhood sleepover. In English, “slept with” can mean either sharing sleep or having sex; the sibling records resolve how this archive item must be classified. Nothing in this metadata supports a sexual act, abuse, or an adult–minor encounter. The record is excluded from the eighteen-record adult chronology.
Verification boundary
Section titled “Verification boundary”This page verifies records, mappings, and the existence of Daniel’s retained writing, not intimate history. The Patreon bodies were directly read. The paid-encounter expansion has exact raw/hash reconciliation and sampled AI visual review, but its speech remains warned machine leads. Additional transcription passes on selected 2019–2021 passages do not amount to human listening or independent corroboration. Exact wording, speaker continuity and underlying accounts remain unverified. Any publishable expansion must remain attributed to Daniel, avoid identifying private participants, preserve uncertainty about consent and legality, and include a response and corroboration status for any wrongdoing allegation.
For longer relationships, see Relationships & Dating Timeline. For the archive rules applied here, see Source & Verification Method.