Collaborators, Creators & Guests
HIMR titles name many other creators, but a named person is not automatically a guest or collaborator. This directory separates three things that are often conflated:
- an archive title that presents someone as appearing or meeting Daniel;
- a commentary or response video that merely names someone; and
- an on-camera appearance directly visible in preserved footage.
Appearance- and meeting-labelled records
Section titled “Appearance- and meeting-labelled records”Xiaorishu
Section titled “Xiaorishu”The 25 August 2017 index contains Live stream with my girlfriend and Xiaorishu, linked to a raw video lasting approximately 3 hours 16 minutes. At the current review level, this establishes the archive’s guest label and media identity—not everything said in the long stream.
Ice Poseidon and Gary
Section titled “Ice Poseidon and Gary”The July 2019 archive contains several meeting-labelled records:
| Index date | Record label | Reconciliation note |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul | Dinner With Ice Poseidon | Platform-ID candidate matches the next row, but file hash and duration differ |
| 18 Jul | I met Ice Poseidon! | Different file hash and duration from Dinner With…; do not collapse automatically |
| 19 Jul | Meeting gary and ice poseidon with my wife | Multiple people are directly visible outdoors |
The last video’s frames at 04:00 and 09:00 visibly show several people gathered on a rainy street. Their public labels come from the archive title; the visual review does not independently identify legal names or establish what anyone said.
Ice Poseidon is named again in August 2023. Seven transcript records using variants of the source title stalking ice poseidon point to one raw-video URL, so they are one shared-media group rather than seven corroborating recordings. The loaded wording is source metadata, not this wiki’s description of anyone’s conduct.
Commentary subjects, not documented collaborators
Section titled “Commentary subjects, not documented collaborators”The following people or channel names appear in archive titles, but the reviewed metadata alone does not show a collaboration:
| Name in title | Example source-led sequence | Safe conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Broad / Abroad in Japan | 2018 I went to the same school as CHRIS BROAD; 2019 My problem with Chris…; 2020 My Apology…; 2022 response record | The archive preserves commentary-labelled records using the name. The titles do not verify the claimed school connection, a dispute, or participation by Broad. |
| Nobita / Find Your Love in Japan | 2019 copyright-strike and apology-response titles; 2020 response titles | The archive preserves Daniel’s public framing. It is not independent evidence of a platform action, apology, or effect on a relationship. |
| The Anime Man / Joey Bizinger | Two 24 December 2017 records share one video | Named commentary subject. The duplicate 2017 records are not two sources. |
| CDawgVA | 2023 My Problem with CDawgVA | Commentary title only. |
| PewDiePie | Titles from 2015 through 2023 | Commentary or impression titles, not a guest history. |
This distinction matters because search results can make a heavily discussed person look like a frequent participant even when the source is only commentary-labelled.
2024 transcript-only meeting labels
Section titled “2024 transcript-only meeting labels”Three records dated 8 April 2024 are titled confronting Abroad in Japan in real life (Chris Broad), meeting CDawgVA and Peter in Osaka, and meeting Chris broad and cdawgva in Osaka. None has a raw-video URL in the current manifest. They remain transcript-index leads: this wiki does not claim the meetings occurred or identify who appears until original media is located.
Notable creator coverage and response cycles
Section titled “Notable creator coverage and response cycles”The creators below need more than a one-row directory entry because the source trail contains responses, repeat coverage, or an on-camera appearance. Exact titles are retained for source identification. Loaded title language remains the uploader’s framing and is not converted into a diagnosis, a misconduct finding, or proof that a video’s narration is complete.
Venus Angelic: a public-name lead, not a confirmed collaboration
Section titled “Venus Angelic: a public-name lead, not a confirmed collaboration”The supplied Venus Angelic Official
channel resolves to stable channel ID
UCIyMwXronD5pT5cx-G_KSHA.
That establishes the public creator identity only. It does not by itself establish
that Venus appeared in, collaborated on, or endorsed a HIMR upload.
No archive title in the 2,227-record snapshot uses “Venus” or “Angelic.” The strongest internal lead is the 18 August 2019 record I had a HUGE argument with my wife. Targeted review of its raw video at 00:00:30, 00:01:05, and 00:01:15 shows Daniel filming a monitor that is playing another creator’s clip. The frames do not independently identify that creator or establish anything said in the soundtrack.
Separate base.en and small.en passes over the public raw file materially agree at
00:01–00:28 that Daniel named Venus Angelic and said a viewer sent her a Super
Chat asking about a collaboration. The interval from approximately
00:27–01:18 contains embedded playback whose speaker separation remains
unresolved, so this page attributes no wording from that interval. At
01:19–02:08, both passes render Daniel saying that a viewer alerted him, that he
entered her livestream chat, and that he posted a hypothetical dating/collaboration
prompt.
No reviewer directly heard the audio. This records only Daniel’s unverified account; it does not prove that Venus saw the message, responded, agreed to collaborate, endorsed Daniel, or had a relationship with him. A bounded search found no Venus first-person response in the audited sources.
Later 2021 and 2023 machine transcripts reuse the name and make stronger interaction claims. Those remain in the private audio queue rather than being folded into this narrow account. Machine text therefore supplies recurring-commentary leads and an unverified account of a stream-chat prompt, not verified commentary, a dating relationship, formal collaboration, endorsement, or private correspondence.
Elvis The Alien: videos, responses, and an on-camera meeting
Section titled “Elvis The Alien: videos, responses, and an on-camera meeting”The official Elvis The Alien channel (stable ID
UChc-m3saf8K2oJHDSsnsj_A)
currently exposes this three-video HIMR sequence:
| Published | Official upload | Platform duration | Related HIMR record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-18 | Hiding In My Room | 21:52 | My response to Elvis The Alien’s video about me, archive-labelled 2018-12-20 |
| 2019-09-13 | Hiding In My Room 2 | 15:56 | My problem with Elvis The Alien, archive-labelled 2019-09-16 |
| 2019-11-25 | Confronting Hiding In My Room | 37:23 | Its official description credits the then-current HIMR channel and links the first two Elvis uploads |
The first two date pairs establish a public video → response-labelled record sequence: two days in the first case and three in the second. They do not establish which criticisms were accurate or how Daniel answered them. The archived response audio has not been manually transcribed for this page.
Between the second and third Elvis uploads, the archive contains the 10 November 2019 video I met Elvis The Alien. The complete 707.140-second preserved file was reconciled to its manifest hashes. At 01:30, two people are directly visible outdoors and one is holding camera equipment. The public Elvis label follows the source title; this frame is not used to decide which person the title names. The visual supports an ordinary on-camera meeting setting, but it does not verify everything said in the video or turn the word “confronting” in the later title into evidence of a face-to-face dispute.
2026 bacon-over-fire callback
Section titled “2026 bacon-over-fire callback”The August 4 life update adds a small retrospective to this established response history. Base.en and targeted small.en passes at approximately 01:21:05–01:21:25 render Daniel recalling Elvis The Alien’s reaction to an older clip in which Daniel cooked bacon on sticks over a fire. The models render Daniel objecting—apparently jokingly or irritably—to Elvis describing it as “lunch meat.”
This is a later memory attributed to Daniel, not a recovered source clip or human-verified Elvis quotation. Exact wording and tone remain open.
KC The Hong Kong Guy: a public channel and a separate archive label trail
Section titled “KC The Hong Kong Guy: a public channel and a separate archive label trail”The supplied handle
@kcthehongkongguy4343
resolves to the public creator display name KC The Hong Kong GuY and stable channel
ID UCIM1ZKBa3oJv8vd1yOLWfzQ.
Its official Atom feed carries a channel-level timestamp of
2019-09-25T09:21:17Z. That is a platform timestamp—not a birth date or proof of an
offline identity.
The official feed currently exposes five titles that directly use “Daniel,” “Daniel Lord,” “Hiding in my room,” or “HIMR”:
“Fake rumors” is retained only as the uploader’s exact title. The table does not decide whether an unspecified rumor was true or false, and automatic captions were not used as verified speech.
The HIMR archive separately contains six 2019 records using the generic title label “Hong Kong guy.” They reconcile to four distinct raw-video identities:
| Archive label date | Title record(s) | Media reconciliation |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | Dinner with the Hong Kong guy | One raw-video identity |
| 2019-09-26 | Getting rid of my love doll with the Hong Kong Guy and Last night at the Airbnb with the Hong Kong guy | Same duration and file hashes; one media identity, not two |
| 2019-10-09 | Going to a love hotel with the Hong Kong guy | One raw-video identity |
| 2019-11-06 | Romantic evening with the Hong Kong guy and Setting things on fire with the Hong Kong guy | Same duration and file hashes; one media identity, not two |
Those titles do not prove relationship framing, sexual conduct, wrongdoing, or the participant’s legal identity. More importantly, the generic archive labels and the stable KC channel are kept as separate evidence trails. Semantic overlap alone is not enough to assert that every “Hong Kong guy” title refers to the supplied channel owner.
There is one later adjacency worth preserving as a research lead. The transcript-only HIMR record meeting the hongkong guy is labelled 17 May 2024; KC’s official feed published Let’s GO, DANIEL ! the next day. The HIMR record has no raw-video URL in the current manifest, so the near dates and compatible labels do not yet prove that both pages document the same event or people.
Turkey Tom: 2025 profile and a reaction-labelled secondary upload
Section titled “Turkey Tom: 2025 profile and a reaction-labelled secondary upload”Turkey Tom’s official channel (stable ID
UCDKJdFer1phQI95UinPZehw)
published The Sociopath YouTuber Who Destroyed His Life (Hiding In My
Room) on 16 March 2025. YouTube’s
watch metadata reports a duration of 4,660 seconds (1:17:40).
Later on the same Pacific-calendar date, the channel Walamo (stable ID
UCk1X3Mnv_xWgMzFii_y6v8g)
published Daniel (Hiding in My Room) Reacts to Turkey
Tom. Its platform duration is
6,573 seconds (1:49:33). The uploader’s description calls it a full, unedited
reupload and says the original stream was deleted by YouTube. Those are Walamo’s
provenance claims, not facts independently established by the current archive.
Accordingly, the wiki describes this as a reaction-labelled secondary upload. The available automatic captions and uploader-created chapter labels remain research leads; no quote about Daniel’s agreement, rebuttal, or intent is presented as human-verified speech.
Daniel’s 2026 machine-rendered assessment
Section titled “Daniel’s 2026 machine-rendered assessment”The later member-gated why I quit YouTube stream adds a useful but still unverified first-person reaction. Independent offline-ASR passes at 01:42:20–01:43:15 render Daniel describing Turkey Tom’s video as relatively fair and insightful rather than a simple attack. The machine text then contrasts it with TikTok reactions that Daniel felt removed context and misunderstood his point.
Inclusion standard for future profiles
Section titled “Inclusion standard for future profiles”A person receives a dedicated profile only when there is enough public, non-invasive material to explain their role without leaning on rumor. A new entry should record:
- the exact title and stable media identity;
- whether the person is visibly or audibly present;
- how the public name was established;
- duplicate or excerpt relationships between records; and
- which statements are Daniel’s account rather than the guest’s or an independent source’s account.
Private friends, dates, bystanders, and family members are not identified merely because viewers speculate about them.