Recording
Canon 750d vs canon 600d - which should you buy
2016-05-05 · 8 min
Machine transcript · wording, timing and speaker attribution may be wrong
Wording, speaker labels, and timestamps can still be wrong. A transcript does not establish that statements in the recording are factual. Use the source links and surrounding context.
Source information & transcript revisions
Transcript revisions
- rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981Machine-generated and unreviewed; may be wrong; not a verified quotation.enraw_asractive167 segments
Transcript
Hi guys, in this video we're going to be
Segment details
0:00–0:02 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_0comparing the Canon 600D versus the 750D.
Segment details
0:03–0:07 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_1The reason why I'm making this video is
Segment details
0:08–0:09 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_2because, well, I'm actually thinking of
Segment details
0:09–0:12 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_3buying one of these cameras myself and I'm
Segment details
0:12–0:15 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_4currently comparing like the different
Segment details
0:15–0:16 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_5models, the older models versus the newer
Segment details
0:17–0:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_6models, Canon versus Nikon, all that, all
Segment details
0:19–0:22 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_7that crazy stuff. So let's get into it.
Segment details
0:22–0:25 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_8So first we'll start off with pricing.
Segment details
0:25–0:27 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_9You can currently get the 600D on Amazon
Segment details
0:28–0:31 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_10for £344, which is pretty good,
Segment details
0:31–0:34 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_11but the 750D costs an extra £100 at
Segment details
0:34–0:38 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_12£444. So let's see what you
Segment details
0:38–0:42 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_13get for that extra £100. Number 1, you get
Segment details
0:42–0:46 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_14a larger viewfinder. 10% larger
Segment details
0:46–0:49 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_15viewfinder. So I don't actually understand
Segment details
0:50–0:52 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_16what these numbers mean, but the 750D has
Segment details
0:53–0:55 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_17a 0.53x versus
Segment details
0:56–0:59 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_18the 600D's 0.51x. So I'm
Segment details
0:59–1:03 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_19guessing you get 0.02x extra.
Segment details
1:04–1:08 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_20So for some reason that makes it 10%
Segment details
1:08–1:10 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_21larger of a viewfinder. Exciting!
Segment details
1:11–1:14 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_22More dynamic range. The 750D has 12 EV.
Segment details
1:16–1:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_23I don't know what EV stands for, versus
Segment details
1:20–1:22 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_24600D which has 11.5 EV,
Segment details
1:22–1:26 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_25which is one whole extra f-stop of dynamic
Segment details
1:26–1:30 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_26range. So dynamic range basically is,
Segment details
1:30–1:32 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_27imagine you have a sunny day with a blue
Segment details
1:32–1:35 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_28sky and you look at it with your eyes,
Segment details
1:36–1:38 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_29your eyeballs, and it looks pretty good,
Segment details
1:38–1:40 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_30doesn't it? The sky is blue, the
Segment details
1:40–1:42 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_31foreground and the background is pretty
Segment details
1:43–1:44 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_32well lit, but if you take a picture with
Segment details
1:45–1:47 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_33your camera, you either have a bright
Segment details
1:48–1:50 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_34foreground and background and like a
Segment details
1:50–1:52 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_35really bright blown-out sky, or if you aim
Segment details
1:52–1:55 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_36the camera at the sky, you get a lovely
Segment details
1:56–1:57 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_37blue sky, but the foreground, the
Segment details
1:57–1:59 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_38buildings, what's on the ground is all
Segment details
1:59–2:01 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_39black. It's all in shadow. So the better
Segment details
2:02–2:04 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_40dynamic range you have, the closer to the
Segment details
2:04–2:07 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_41human eye the image is going to be. At
Segment details
2:07–2:10 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_42least that's what I think it is. It might—
Segment details
2:10–2:11 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_43I might be wrong, but I don't think I'm
Segment details
2:12–2:13 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_44wrong because I I don't know. Anyway, on
Segment details
2:13–2:15 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_45to the next one: better image quality.
Segment details
2:15–2:17 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_46Well, if it's a later model, then
Segment details
2:18–2:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_47obviously it's going to have better image
Segment details
2:20–2:21 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_48quality, but how much better, you may ask?
Segment details
2:21–2:25 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_49The 750D has 71.0
Segment details
2:25–2:30 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_50image quality out of 100, I guess, versus
Segment details
2:30–2:33 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_5165.0 of the 600D. So that's around 10%
Segment details
2:33–2:37 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_52better image quality, apparently. Um, 10%
Segment details
2:38–2:40 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_53better image quality, you're not really
Segment details
2:41–2:42 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_54gonna notice it to be honest. Much higher—
Segment details
2:43–2:45 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_55okay, the next one is much higher true
Segment details
2:46–2:47 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_56resolution. 750D has 24 megapixels versus
Segment details
2:48–2:51 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_5717.9 megapixels of the 600D,
Segment details
2:51–2:54 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_58and that lets you capture 30% more detail
Segment details
2:55–2:58 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_59in your photos. But you're not really
Segment details
2:58–3:00 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_60going to find this useful unless you like
Segment details
3:00–3:02 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_61to crop into your photos a lot, or if you
Segment details
3:03–3:05 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_62like to print out really big printouts of
Segment details
3:06–3:07 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_63your photos, like posters, huge, huge
Segment details
3:07–3:10 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_64massive posters, which I'm guessing most
Segment details
3:10–3:13 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_65people don't do. So the difference between
Segment details
3:13–3:16 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_6624 megapixels and 17.9 megapixels is, is
Segment details
3:16–3:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_67barely noticeable. The next one is lower
Segment details
3:20–3:22 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_68noise at high ISO. The 750D
Segment details
3:23–3:27 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_69has an ISO rating of 919
Segment details
3:27–3:31 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_70versus 793 of the 600D.
Segment details
3:31–3:36 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_71So the 750D has a slight edge of 0.2
Segment details
3:36–3:39 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_72f-stops in low noise, so it's
Segment details
3:39–3:43 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_73gonna be better at higher ISO than
Segment details
3:44–3:48 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_74the 600D, which is kind of obvious because
Segment details
3:49–3:51 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_75it's a newer camera. So yeah, it's going
Segment details
3:51–3:54 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_76to be slightly less grainy when using
Segment details
3:54–3:57 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_77higher ISO. Okay, so the next one is
Segment details
3:57–4:00 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_78touchscreen. I don't really care about
Segment details
4:00–4:02 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_79touchscreens. I don't know why they bother
Segment details
4:02–4:04 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_80putting touchscreens onto cameras. I think
Segment details
4:04–4:07 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_81they're just trying to, trying to make it
Segment details
4:07–4:09 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_82feel like a smartphone, but I don't like
Segment details
4:09–4:11 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_83using a touchscreen on the camera. I'd
Segment details
4:11–4:13 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_84rather use the physical buttons because I
Segment details
4:13–4:15 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_85don't want to get finger oils and
Segment details
4:15–4:16 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_86fingerprints on the screen all the time.
Segment details
4:17–4:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_87So I don't really care about touchscreen.
Segment details
4:19–4:21 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_88Better color depth: 22.7 bits versus 22.1
Segment details
4:22–4:26 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_89bits distinguishes 0.6 more bits of color.
Segment details
4:26–4:29 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_90I have no idea what that means, but it
Segment details
4:30–4:32 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_91sounds really, really unimpressive. Now
Segment details
4:32–4:36 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_92this is where it gets interesting— many
Segment details
4:36–4:38 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_93more cross-type focus points. The 750D has
Segment details
4:38–4:41 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_9419 cross-type focus points, and the 600D
Segment details
4:41–4:44 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_95only has 1. Now cross-type focus points
Segment details
4:45–4:47 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_96are different to normal focus points
Segment details
4:47–4:49 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_97because, well, I guess they're cross-type,
Segment details
4:50–4:52 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_98aren't they? I don't really know, I don't
Segment details
4:52–4:54 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_99really understand how it's different, but
Segment details
4:54–4:55 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_100the better for some reason. So you get,
Segment details
4:56–4:58 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_101you get 19 versus 1, so the 750D
Segment details
4:58–5:02 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_102is going to have so much better autofocus.
Segment details
5:02–5:05 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_103It's going to be so much faster, so much
Segment details
5:05–5:06 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_104more accurate than the 600D. So yeah,
Segment details
5:07–5:11 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_105if you're doing video stuff like that,
Segment details
5:11–5:13 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_106having a good reliable autofocus is really
Segment details
5:14–5:17 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_107important. On to the next one, better
Segment details
5:18–5:19 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_108maximum light sensitivity,
Segment details
5:20–5:21 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_10925,600 ISO.
Segment details
5:21–5:24 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_110Capability for the 750D compared to the
Segment details
5:24–5:27 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_1116400 ISO for the 600D.
Segment details
5:28–5:30 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_112So you can go all the way up to 25,600 ISO
Segment details
5:30–5:34 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_113on the 750D, which is huge. It is so much
Segment details
5:34–5:38 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_114brighter at that ISO level compared to
Segment details
5:39–5:42 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_1156400 ISO. It says 4 f-stops better,
Segment details
5:42–5:45 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_116but I don't really see myself using such
Segment details
5:46–5:49 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_117a high ISO because it's just going to be
Segment details
5:50–5:51 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_118so grainy It's going to have so much noise
Segment details
5:52–5:54 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_119and I don't really think it's necessary.
Segment details
5:54–5:55 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_120Shoots faster, 5 FPS versus 3.7 FPS,
Segment details
5:57–6:01 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_12140% faster continuous shooting. Now this
Segment details
6:02–6:05 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_122is only important if you're taking
Segment details
6:05–6:06 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_123fast-moving pictures of fast-moving
Segment details
6:07–6:09 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_124subjects like sports or birds,
Segment details
6:09–6:12 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_125racing cars. I'm not really into that
Segment details
6:13–6:15 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_126stuff so it's not really important for me,
Segment details
6:15–6:17 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_127the FPS. More focus points. The 750D
Segment details
6:17–6:21 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_128has 19 focus points versus 9 focus points
Segment details
6:21–6:25 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_129of the 600D, so you get a lot more focus
Segment details
6:25–6:28 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_130points, a lot more cross-type focus
Segment details
6:28–6:29 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_131points. So yeah, in general, the 750D is
Segment details
6:30–6:32 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_132going to be a lot faster for autofocus,
Segment details
6:32–6:33 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_133which is, which is probably the main
Segment details
6:35–6:36 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_134reason I would choose the 750D over the
Segment details
6:36–6:39 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_135600D. And then we have like the size
Segment details
6:39–6:43 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_136and weight. It's not really much thinner,
Segment details
6:43–6:45 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_137it's pretty much the same. Weight is
Segment details
6:45–6:47 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_138pretty much the same, and yeah,
Segment details
6:47–6:49 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_139lightness, which I guess is the same as
Segment details
6:50–6:52 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_140weight, is also pretty much the same. So
Segment details
6:52–6:54 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_141if you're considering getting the 750D,
Segment details
6:55–6:57 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_142the reasons why you'd spend the extra £100
Segment details
6:58–7:01 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_143over the 600D would be the faster
Segment details
7:01–7:03 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_144autofocus and the better ISO,
Segment details
7:03–7:07 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_145uh, I guess you would get it if you want
Segment details
7:08–7:11 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_146more megapixels, 24 megapixels versus 18,
Segment details
7:11–7:14 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_147but for me the most important bit would be
Segment details
7:15–7:18 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_148the autofocus. So yeah, in my opinion it
Segment details
7:19–7:21 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_149is worth spending the extra £100 for the
Segment details
7:21–7:24 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_150extra features. The image quality probably
Segment details
7:24–7:27 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_151isn't that much better. It was— it's
Segment details
7:27–7:29 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_152definitely better, but it's not going to
Segment details
7:30–7:31 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_153be like really, really, really noticeable.
Segment details
7:31–7:34 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_154The main thing that would be really
Segment details
7:35–7:36 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_155different would be the autofocus. I can
Segment details
7:37–7:39 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_156imagine it would just be so much faster
Segment details
7:39–7:40 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_157than the 600D. So that was the 750D versus
Segment details
7:41–7:43 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_158the 600D specifications comparison.
Segment details
7:43–7:47 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_159Thanks for watching, I guess. I'm probably
Segment details
7:48–7:50 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_160going to make more of these videos, like
Segment details
7:51–7:52 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_161the 80D versus the 750D, and then I'll do
Segment details
7:53–7:56 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_162Nikon and then the Sony cameras. I'm not
Segment details
7:56–7:58 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_163sure, I still have a lot of cameras to
Segment details
7:59–8:00 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_164look through before I make my decision.
Segment details
8:00–8:01 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_165And I'll see you in the next one.
Segment details
8:03–8:05 · rev_c4909291c2b7d750cba283478d376981_166